025-83701931 设为首页 加入收藏
文章摘要
水中粪大肠菌群检测方法的比较
Comparison between Paper Disk Method and Multiple-tube Fermentation Technique in Water Fecal Bacteria (Thermotoleerant Coliform Bacteria) Detection
  
DOI:
中文关键词: 粪大肠菌群  纸片快速法  多管发酵法  水质
英文关键词: Fecal coliform  Paper disk method  Multiple tube fermentation method  Water quality
基金项目:2009年度国家环境保护标准制修订基金资助项目(987)
作者单位
丁程成 环境保护部南京环境科学研究所 
沈丽娟 常州市环境监测中心 
张翔 常州市环境监测中心 
徐东炯 常州市环境监测中心 
陈桥 常州市环境监测中心 
张小琼 常州市环境监测中心 
汤云 常州市环境监测中心 
李晶 常州市环境监测中心 
摘要点击次数: 1665
全文下载次数: 2154
中文摘要:
      采用标准菌株、实际水样和国际标准样品,比较纸片快速法与多管发酵法的一致性。标准菌株试验表明,两种方法在粪大肠菌群的定性检测上没有显著性差异;实际水样试验表明,纸片快速法的检测结果略低于多管发酵法,但两种方法检测结果的回归关系显著;国际标准样品试验表明,两种方法的精密度与准确度均无统计学意义上的显著性差异。
英文摘要:
      Three kinds of samples were used to compare the uniformity between multiple tube fermentation method and paper disk method on detection of fecal coliform,including water sample,reference culture,and international reference sample. The result showed: there was no significant difference between the qualitative detection,the accuracy and precision of the two test methods,although the difference on quantitative detection of water sample was significant. And there was a high correlation between them. All those showed that paper disk method could be a directive method to detect microbe in water.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭