|
| 丙酮法和热乙醇法测定浮游植物叶绿素a的方法比对 |
| Comparison of Two Methods for Measurement of Phytoplanktonic Chlorophyll-a |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 叶绿素a 浮游植物 热乙醇法 丙酮法 分光光度法 水质 |
| 英文关键词: Chlorophyll-a Phytoplankton Hot ethanol extraction method Acetone method Spectropho tometry Water quality |
| 基金项目:国家级大学生创新创业训练计划基金资助项目（20 1310403013）；江西省教育厅科技计划基金资助项目（GJJ14149） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 896 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 将丙酮法和热乙醇法用于测定浮游植物叶绿素a，分析水样中是否加入碳酸镁、水样体积、萃取时间、萃取剂、破碎方法、离心时间、水样存放时间和滤膜样品存放时间等8个因素对测定的影响，并确定最佳试验条件。结果表明：2种方法的测定值之间有较好的线性关系，相比丙酮法，热乙醇法更具优势。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Chlorophyll a was determined by acetone method and hot ethanol method. Eight factors (whether the magnesium carbonate was added or not, sample volume, extraction time, extraction solvent, crushing method, centrifugal time, storage time of water sample and filter membrane) were analyzed to determine the best test condition. Experimental results showed that the measured values were good linear correlation between acetone method and hot ethanol method. Hot ethanol shows an advantage over acetone method. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
