025-83701931 设为首页 加入收藏
文章摘要
嵌入式电袋复合除尘器除尘性能实验研究
Experimental Study on Dust removal Performance of Embedded Electrostatic fabric Integrated Precipitator
  
DOI:
中文关键词: 嵌入式电袋复合除尘器  除尘性能  开孔率  结构优化  分级效率
英文关键词: Embedded electrostatic fabric integrated precipitator  Dust removal performance  Open porosity  Structural optimization  Classification efficiency
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51464016); 江西省教育厅基金资助项目(GJJ14421)
作者单位
宿雅威 江西理工大学资源与环境工程学院 
董冰岩 江西理工大学资源与环境工程学院 
孙宇 江西理工大学资源与环境工程学院 
陈祖云 江西理工大学资源与环境工程学院 
解彬 江西理工大学资源与环境工程学院 
谢寅寅 江西理工大学资源与环境工程学院 
邓苇 江西理工大学资源与环境工程学院 
摘要点击次数: 792
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      通过建立实验模型分别研究了工作电压、入口风速、开孔率和电晕线数对嵌入式电袋复合除尘器除尘效率的影响。通过对比优化得出复合除尘器的最佳结构参数,以及较优的工作电压和入口风速,并对优化后的复合除尘器进行分级效率测定,结果表明:随着开孔率的增加,除尘效率先减小后增大,当开孔率为0.356时复合除尘效率最高;在一定范围内,随着工作电压的增大除尘效率升高,当工作电压为40 kV时,除尘效率高达97.1%;电晕线数对除尘效率影响较大,当电晕线数为7时除尘效率最好;在最佳结构参数和最优操作条件下,复合除尘器对PM2.5的去除效率高达92.4%,比相同实验条件下单一电除尘器提高11%。
英文摘要:
      An experimental model was established to research the effect of working voltage, entrance velocity, porosity, corona wire number on the dust removal efficiency of embedded electrostatic fabric integrated precipitator. The optimal structure parameters of the integrated precipitator were obtained, and the working voltage and entrance velocity were optimized as well. The classification efficiency of the optimized integrated precipitator was tested. The experimental results showed that with the increase of the aperture ratio, the dust removal efficiency increased first and decreased later. When the opening porosity was 0.356, the combined dust removal efficiency reached to maximum. Within a certain range, the dust collection efficiency increased with the working voltage rising. When the voltage was 40 kV, the dust removal efficiency was 97.1%. The corona line had great influence on dust removal. When the corona line number was 7, the combined dust removal efficiency reached to maximum. Under the optimal structure parameters and the optimal operating conditions, the removal efficiency of PM2.5 was 92.4%. In the same experimental conditions, the removal efficiency increased by 11% compared to the electrical precipitator.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭