025-83701931 设为首页 加入收藏
文章摘要
重量法与光散射法监测北京市PM2.5的结果比对分析
Comparison of PM2.5 Mass Concentration in Beijing Measured by Gravimetric Method and Light Scattering Method
  
DOI:
中文关键词: PM2.5  重量法  光散射法  比对分析
英文关键词: PM2.5  Gravimetric method  Light scattering method  Comparative analysis
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(41475133)
作者单位
张婷婷 北京建筑大学 
马文林 北京建筑大学北京市理化分析测试中心 
亓学奎 北京市理化分析测试中心 
曲晶明 北京市理化分析测试中心 
贾凯 北京市理化分析测试中心 
刘艳菊 北京麋鹿生态实验中心 
摘要点击次数: 798
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      选择大气污染较重的北京西三环典型交通带作为研究区域,采用重量法和光散射法监测PM2.5。参照美国EPA关于PM2.5连续监测仪器手工采样比对测试的性能指标和认证方法,结合我国现行的相关技术规范,采用平行性检验及线性回归分析两种方法测定结果间的有效性和可比性。结果表明:两种方法测定PM2.5的结果具有较好的相关性,然而受颗粒物物理性质、化学组成及温湿度等的影响,测定结果间存在一定偏差,采用光散射法监测PM2.5仍需用重量法做修正。
英文摘要:
      PM2.5 mass concentration from a sampling site near West 3rd Ring Road in a typical traffic zone in Beijing was measured by gravimetric method and light scattering method. According to U.S. EPA authentication method and equipment performance indexes in the comparison of continuous monitoring and manual monitoring, in combination with the national current relevant technical specifications, the availability and comparability of the two methods were discussed by parallelism test and linear regression analysis. Results showed that PM2.5 mass concentration measured by the two methods were well correlated, there was a certain deviation between them due to the influence of physical properties, chemical composition, temperature and humidity. Light scattering method still needs to be corrected by gravimetric method.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭