025-83701931 设为首页 加入收藏
文章摘要
碳组分不同监测分析技术的比较
Comparison of Different Monitoring and Analysis Techniques for Carbon Components
  
DOI:
中文关键词: 有机碳  元素碳  在线监测  比对分析
英文关键词: Organic carbon  Elemental carbon  On-line monitoring  Comparative analysis
基金项目:江苏省环境监测科研基金资助项目(2112);南京市环保科技基金资助项目(201910)
作者单位
董晶晶 江苏省南京环境监测中心 
李洁 江苏省南京环境监测中心 
丁峰 江苏省南京环境监测中心 
李源慧 江苏省南京环境监测中心 
摘要点击次数: 307
全文下载次数: 18
中文摘要:
      采用在线监测和实验室分析方法,分别在热光透射法(TOT)NIOSH 5040、870升温协议和热光反射法(TOR)IMPROVE A升温协议下测定PM2.5中有机碳(OC)、元素碳(EC),并将各测定结果做比对分析。结果表明,在线监测(NIOSH 5040)与实验室分析(IMPROVE A)结果的相关系数R>0.8,总体相关性较好,EC值差异略大;在线监测与实验室分析在NIOSH 870协议下TC测定值总体相近,OC与EC测定值略有差异;在线监测中NIOSH 5040协议下的OC测定值略低于870协议,EC测定值略高于870协议,日常监测中两种温度协议均可选择。
英文摘要:
      Organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) in PM2.5 were determined by NIOSH 5040、870 heating protocol therm-optical transmission (TOT) for on-line monitoring and IMPROVE-A heating protocol thermal optical reflection (TOR) for laboratory analysis, respectively. By comparing and analyzing the test results, it showed that the correlation coefficient between on-line monitoring (NIOSH 5040) and laboratory analysis (IMPROVE-A) was more than 0.8, the overall correlation was good, the difference between EC values was slightly larger. Under NIOSH 870 protocol, TC values measured by on-line monitoring and laboratory analysis were generally similar, while OC values and EC values were slightly different. For on-line monitoring, OC values under NIOSH 5040 protocol were slightly lower than that of 870 protocol, while EC values were slightly higher than that of 870 protocol. Both temperature protocols were optional in daily monitoring.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭