|
HPLC和GC-MS法测定环境空气中醛酮类化合物比对分析 |
Comparison of HPLC and GC-MS for the Determination of Aldehydes and Ketones in Ambient Air |
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: 醛酮类化合物 高效液相色谱法 气相色谱〖CD*2〗质谱法 比对分析 环境空气 |
英文关键词: Aldehydes and ketones High performance liquid chromatography Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry Comparative analysis Ambient air |
基金项目:国家重点研发计划基金资助项目(2017YFC0212206);陕西省重点研发计划基金资助项目(2021ZDLSF05-07);陕西省环境科学研究院2020年重点研发计划基金资助项目(HKY-2020-YF-017) |
|
摘要点击次数: 605 |
全文下载次数: 205 |
中文摘要: |
对2,4-二硝基苯肼吸附衍生-高效液相色谱(DNPH-HPLC)法和罐采样/气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)法的测定条件进行优化,将两种方法测定环境空气中13种醛酮类化合物(OVOCs)的结果做比对分析。结果表明,HPLC法和GC-MS法均可实现一次进样13种OVOCs全分析,方法检出限分别为0.26μg/m3~1.39μg/m3和0.49μg/m3~1.10μg/m3,加标回收率分别为95.9%~111%和52.0%~138%。两种方法测定实际样品,检出组分的测定结果无显著性差异;HPLC法适合测定环境空气中低碳类(C1~C3)低浓度OVOCs,GC-MS法适合测定多碳类(C4~C8)低浓度OVOCs。 |
英文摘要: |
13 aldehydes and ketones (OVOCs) in ambient air were determined by 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine adsorption derivatization-high performance liquid chromatography(DNPH-HPLC) and canister collection/gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The determination conditions of the two methods were optimized and the measurements were compared. The results showed that both HPLC and GC-MS could achieve the analysis of 13 OVOCs in one injection. The method detection limits were 0.26μg/m3~1.39μg/m3 and 0.49μg/m3~1.10μg/m3, respectively. The recoveries were 95.9%~111% and 52.0%~138%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the results of detected components in practical samples between the two methods. HPLC was suitable for determining low concentration of low-carbon (C1~C3) OVOCs in ambient air, while GC-MS was suitable for determining low concentration of multiple carbon (C4~C8) OVOCs. |
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |